google-site-verification: google73fd06521940cdfe.html Noneillah: June 2025

Friday, June 27, 2025

“Gangsta Rap vs. Heavy Metal: The Truth They Won’t Tell You” Noneillah PODCAST / VIDEO SCRIPT

 “Gangsta Rap vs. Heavy Metal: The Truth They Won’t Tell You”

Noneillah PODCAST / VIDEO SCRIPT:

🎧 Intro music fades in

Host  Naomi Johnson:

“Why is it that every time a Black rapper gets into legal trouble, the media has a field day, but when a white rock star or metal artist does the same — or worse — it’s swept under the rug? Let’s talk about it.”

“Gangsta rap is always labeled as violent, toxic, or degrading to women. But what about heavy metal and hard rock? Those artists rap about literal murder, rape, Satanism, and disrespect toward white women — but somehow, they’re seen as ‘artistic’ or ‘rebellious.’”

“Look at lyrics from metal bands like Slayer, Cannibal Corpse, or even old Guns N’ Roses. They talk about torturing women, shooting people for fun, and overdosing on drugs. But when rappers speak about their trauma, poverty, or survival — they’re demonized as criminals.”

“White celebrities like Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Roman Polanski had real allegations of predatory behavior, but they’re still celebrated. Meanwhile, Black artists are destroyed in the court of public opinion before they even step into a courtroom.”

“And let’s be real — white-on-white crime exists too. From mass shootings to biker gangs to meth-fueled domestic abuse — that doesn’t get turned into a cultural crisis.”

“So here’s the truth: The problem isn’t the music — it’s the racism. If we’re gonna talk about accountability, let’s make it equal. Black music is not more violent. White culture is not more pure. And it’s time to break down the double standard.”


“If this hit home, share this episode. Follow for more unfiltered truth on culture, music, and justice.” 

Exposing Hypocrisy: The Double Standard in Celebrity Scandals and Cultural Judgment

Exposing Hypocrisy: The Double Standard in Celebrity Scandals and Cultural Judgment

By Noneillah

In recent months, headlines have been flooded with lawsuits, accusations, and scandals involving some of the most prominent Black celebrities in entertainment, sports, and even the church. Names like Shannon Sharpe, Tyler Perry, Pastor T.D. Jakes, and others have surfaced in legal and social controversies. And the allegations surrounding Sean "Diddy" Combs’ infamous “freak-off” parties have spiraled into a web of celebrity name drops — Oprah Winfrey, Will and Jada Smith, Ellen DeGeneres, Leonardo DiCaprio, Naomi Campbell, the Kardashians, Ashton Kutcher — sparking widespread speculation about who knew what, and who did what.

But in the midst of all this coverage, a troubling pattern emerges: a hyper-focus on Black celebrities while white celebrities remain curiously under the radar. Why does mainstream media — including major news outlets, TikTokers, YouTubers, and bloggers — seem so eager to tear down Black public figures, while ignoring or downplaying the actions of white celebrities involved in similar or worse behavior?

This is not a defense of wrongdoing — no matter the race, those who harm others must be held accountable. However, what we are witnessing is not just accountability; it’s a racially selective public shaming.

The Media's Obsession with Black "Fallen Stars"

For decades, American media has had a deep fascination with the rise and fall of Black entertainers. From Michael Jackson to Bill Cosby to R. Kelly, the media turns their personal tragedies and moral failures into extended soap operas. Meanwhile, numerous white celebrities with a long history of disturbing behavior — from abuse to addiction to violence — either go unreported or are given a path to redemption that Black stars rarely receive.

Let’s talk about the music. Rap and hip-hop are frequently demonized as promoting violence, misogyny, and drug use. Yet heavy metal, rock, and other genres have long explored themes of death, darkness, sexual perversion, and chaos. Bands like KISS, Dio, and Marilyn Manson have promoted imagery and lyrics far darker than anything in mainstream rap — yet they're often celebrated as "artistic" or "rebellious" rather than dangerous.

Why is dark, aggressive content in Black music portrayed as a threat to society, while the same themes in white music are considered edgy and cathartic?

The Double Standard in Morality

The same white-led media that condemns hip-hop culture as savage often turns a blind eye to the depravity in its own backyard. Let’s not forget: Hollywood — the very machine that has chewed up and spit out countless Black artists — is run predominantly by white gatekeepers. The culture of silence around sexual exploitation, abuse, and manipulation in entertainment didn’t start in the Black community. It was built by the powerful, protected by money, and passed down to those seeking access and success.

What many people fail to acknowledge is that much of the exploitative behavior exhibited in Black Hollywood was learned behavior — patterns modeled by a white-dominated industry that profits off of chaos and controversy. From casting couches to secret sex parties, from industry “mentors” who groom new talent to executives who use influence as a weapon, Black celebrities are not only participating — they are often repeating cycles that were normalized by the very people who taught them how to play the game.

It's Bigger Than the Headlines

When white celebrities are exposed — and many have been — the media response is often muted, or they're swiftly offered a comeback narrative. Johnny Depp, Marilyn Manson, Armie Hammer, and others have faced allegations ranging from domestic abuse to cannibalism fantasies, and yet, they’re still afforded complexity, sympathy, or creative genius status.

The message is clear: white celebrities are flawed artists, Black celebrities are criminals.

We must stop this narrative.

Holding Everyone Accountable — Equally

It’s time for balanced reporting. It’s time to call out abuse, trafficking, and exploitation wherever it appears — whether in the studio, the pulpit, or the boardroom. But it is equally important to recognize the deep-seated racial bias in how these stories are told, repeated, and judged.

Black culture is not inherently more violent, more sexual, or more corrupt than white culture — despite what the media suggests. Music, art, and identity reflect the full spectrum of the human experience. If society wants to examine the dark side of fame, it must be willing to look beyond race and face the truth that power — not skin color — is the root of abuse.

Final Thoughts

As a society, we must be vigilant — not just in exposing wrongdoing, but in recognizing who gets exposed, and who gets protected. Accountability should not be color-coded. If we’re going to shine a light on the shadows of celebrity life, let it shine on all sides — not just those society has historically painted as “dangerous.”

Let’s demand justice, truth, and fairness — across the board.

Federal Appeals Court Upholds R. Kelly’s Convictions and 30-Year Prison Sentence

 Federal Appeals Court Upholds R. Kelly’s Convictions and 30-Year Prison Sentence

June 27, 2025 — By Noneillah

NEW YORK — A federal appeals court has upheld R&B singer R. Kelly’s 2021 convictions for racketeering and sex trafficking, along with his 30-year prison sentence, reaffirming that the disgraced performer used his fame and power to sexually exploit young girls and women for over two decades.

In a decisive ruling issued Wednesday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Kelly’s efforts to overturn his conviction. The three-judge panel concluded that “enabled by a constellation of managers, assistants, and other staff for over twenty-five years, Kelly exploited his fame to lure girls and young women into his grasp.”

The court emphasized that trial evidence showed how Kelly would isolate his victims from friends and family, assert control over their daily lives, and subject them to verbal, physical, and sexual abuse.

This ruling comes nearly a year after the court heard oral arguments in Kelly’s appeal. His attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, criticized the decision, calling it “unprecedented” and vowing to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. She argued the racketeering charge was misapplied in a manner far removed from the statute’s original intent and claimed the case set a dangerous precedent for prosecutorial overreach.

However, the appeals panel rejected a host of Kelly’s legal arguments, including claims that trial evidence was insufficient, that the judge made improper rulings, and that several jurors were biased. The court also found no error in allowing accusers to testify that Kelly knowingly exposed them to herpes and admitted graphic videos that illustrated the extent of his control over victims.

“None of the testimony was more inflammatory than the charged acts,” the court stated, defending the inclusion of highly sensitive and disturbing evidence presented during the Brooklyn federal trial.

One partial dissent came from Circuit Judge Richard J. Sullivan, who agreed with the majority’s ruling but took issue with a restitution award. Sullivan objected to the financial judgment for one victim to receive a lifetime supply of name-brand herpes medication, arguing a generic alternative would have sufficed. Bonjean seized on this point, accusing prosecutors of trying “to unfairly enrich government witnesses for their testimony.”

Kelly, born Robert Sylvester Kelly, is best known for songs like “I Believe I Can Fly” and the “Trapped in the Closet” series. Despite decades of rumors and allegations, Kelly maintained commercial success and public support well into the 2000s. His 2008 acquittal on child pornography charges in Chicago only added to his image of invincibility.

That changed dramatically following the #MeToo movement and the release of the 2019 documentary Surviving R. Kelly, which featured powerful testimony from survivors and reignited public pressure for accountability.

In 2022, Kelly was separately convicted in a Chicago federal court on charges of producing child sexual abuse material and coercing minors into sex. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to review that case last year, leaving a 20-year sentence in place — 19 years of which will be served concurrently with his existing 30-year term.

With the 2nd Circuit’s ruling, Kelly’s legal avenues for relief continue to narrow. While his attorney hopes for a Supreme Court review, the appellate court’s strongly worded opinion leaves little doubt about the judiciary’s stance on Kelly’s crimes and the methods he used to conceal them for decades.

As of today, R. Kelly remains incarcerated, serving out what is effectively a life sentence for his prolonged abuse of power, and the survivors who testified against him have secured a hard-fought measure of justice.